Sunday, March 31, 2013

Happy Easter

From the Uglies



24 comments:

  1. Is that a picture of Billy and Vomit?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The lack of comments on this blog finally proves, once and for all, that K2 was posting the majority of comments.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Or people have moved on and found better things to do! Seems Zeekypo is dead too or he's so poor now that his mommy is gone he has lost all!!!!


    AnonymousApril 7, 2013 at 7:10 AM
    The lack of comments on this blog finally proves, once and for all, that K2 was posting the majority of comments

    ReplyDelete
  4. K2 is still running this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  5. k2 died and so did bonnie wtf have you been

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Where's the proof? Oh that's right, you don't have any

      Delete
  6. Did anyone know that Mack from the room was doing Big Fat Cindy!!Thats hard up he is!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Good post however , I was wondering if you could write a litte more on this subject?

    I'd be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit more. Thank you!

    my page; dental implant costs

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh Mack say it isn't true. Do you know how evil that woman is?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hey did you all know Macks into Voyeurism ?? AKA Peek a Boo hes watching you .

    ReplyDelete
  10. If I remember right Cindy let her grandson get burned by a curling iron cause she wouldn't log off aol.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Cindy is a POS. She steals from people, lies all the time and spends all her time stuffing that fat face and stalking people. She's poor as shit and lives on state assistence just like Bonnie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cindy was raised white trash so no figure she fucks niggers. Don't know her daddy and neither do her kids know thier daddy. now jen doing the same thing going from spic to spic who fuck her and run off. well mom cindy pays mens way too so they come back once in awhile she also stalks men

      Delete
    2. did you finish primary school? I know first graders who write better then you

      Delete
  12. no no no mack was doing fat sassystillhere they hooked up at the fourth of july cookout with that chick pama and robin and merry go round i mean well round and her real pictures got out showing her fat as hell and not skinny holdin a fishie.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I read this post fully regarding the comparison of latest and previous
    technologies, it's awesome article.

    Visit my website ... cernotin.Cz

    ReplyDelete
  14. Adultmatchdoctor.com and others.....tells all jalookin doesn't it Mack! Find out your no better than people you have commented on!!! Rooster spoke the true about you! .Mack did not get any ass on the 4th or anytime he says he does. It's in his blown up big head and make believe!From all the woman should of, would of and could of! Nanci, Hoser ,Fat Cindy and Zeekypo you could , would and should your all right up each others ugly Ass!

    ReplyDelete
  15. So if everyone is fat than Mack's likes the heavier one's?

    ReplyDelete
  16. What Mack's has told me Rose even went after him.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Wasn't Zeeke and Cindy having oral sex some time ago?

    ReplyDelete
  18. How come Cindy's kids have different last names?

    ReplyDelete
  19. fat sassy is back we see

    ReplyDelete
  20. Now where are those legal beagles at who claim that you can not be sued for deformation of character and using a person's picture without their consent to defame, alter, and harrass.




    The family of a Tennessee man with Down syndrome was devastated when they discovered a photo of their disabled son had spawned a derogatory Internet meme. So to quash the widespread use of the altered image and -- hopefully -- help others who may be subjected to the offense in the future, Adam Holland's family filed a $18 million lawsuit last week.

    The photo of a teenage Holland holding up a piece of his artwork during a class at the Vanderbilt Kennedy Center in 2004 did not make waves until last year, when modified versions of the image that included defamatory messages popped up on numerous websites.

    "It was devastating for this family, emotionally," Larry Crain, the attorney who represents the Hollands, told Nashville's WSMV-TV. "He's a very likable, very presentable young man who I don't think fully appreciates the hurt that's been inflicted on him."

    Though the family is not aware of exactly how the photo sparked the meme nearly a decade later, the Hollands pinpointed several sites, including the website of Florida radio station WHPT-FM, that allegedly repurposed the photo.

    Having filed the defamation suit in a Tennessee U.S. District Court on April 22, the Hollands seek from three parties $3 million in compensatory damages and $3 million in punitive damages, amounting to $18 million in total.

    Whether the Holland family's lawsuit triumphs or not, advocacy groups are campaigning to ban the widespread use of messages that are offensive to people with special needs.

    "Spread the Word to End the Word," a collaboration between the Special Olympics and Best Buddies that launched in 2009 to ban the word "retard," seeks to spread awareness of the "dehumanizing and hurtful effects" of the so-called "r-word." As ABC News reports, the group got involved in the Holland's case over the summer, contacting the Florida radio station about the altered photo, which featured Holland holding a sign that read "Retarded News." In response, Program Director Michael Sharkey apologized in an email to the campaign, adding that the image had been removed.

    "The segment 'Retarded News' is designed to highlight odd stories that are seemingly always in the news," he explained, according to the lawsuit. "These stories are NOT about disabled individuals. However, in our investigation, we noted the picture that he was using did denote a person with Down syndrome."

    Woodrow Hartzog, an assistant professor at Alabama's Cumberland School of Law at Samford University, said cases like Holland's -- which involve an image being repurposed as a meme -- raise a host of legal questions and are "very difficult."

    "The torts that traditionally protected individuals against harmful use of depictions and photos are largely ineffective today,” Hartzog told Nashville's The City Paper. "They are really difficult to win at trial because it’s hard to prove things like damages -- and the First Amendment has really pulled back on the scope of many of these torts."

    ReplyDelete

Don't be jealous of the Ugly's.